Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Can someone explain this discrepancy? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Tipa Riot wrote: 100 * 0.8 * 0.85 = 68 -> 32% bonus Thanks!
- by Nina Lowel - at 2016.09.14 20:34:50
|
2. Can someone explain this discrepancy? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I'm curious and can't figure this out myself Manufacturing a T1 frigate. Under Job Duration modifiers, it says I have -32% from Skills and Implants. Now I have no implants for manufacturing time so just going off skills. It shows the skills I ha...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2016.09.14 20:26:52
|
3. A question about remembering your purchases... - in Market Discussions [original thread]
https://evething.org /
- by Nina Lowel - at 2016.09.01 01:29:34
|
4. Question about market prices being removed from low/high history. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
I noticed CCP deletes max/min price history if they fall out of a specific range automatically at DT, does anyone know this range % wise?
- by Nina Lowel - at 2016.09.01 01:12:22
|
5. Announcement:March release - General feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ralph King-Griffin wrote: CCP Larrikin wrote: Ultimately we're broadly happy with the design choice we've made and believe that players privacy is an important factor to consider. regarding this, why can i still locate someone who is not l...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2016.08.16 00:46:55
|
6. Who Killed High-Sec/Casual PvP? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
What killed highsec merc work? Highsec mercs did. They are extremely lazy, which the contact change shows quite plainly. Most mercs are extremely risk averse. Their KB's are their holy grails and are less about objectives and more about k...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2016.08.16 00:41:10
|
7. Who Killed High-Sec/Casual PvP? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
edit: multipost
- by Nina Lowel - at 2016.08.16 00:39:21
|
8. NO! to Daily Opportunities - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
What is the design goal around the SP gain?
- by Nina Lowel - at 2016.04.13 19:26:09
|
9. Question about XML paths - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Hello, Im importing information into google docs Is there a way to import and entire xml sheet at once? Im not sure if I am explaining this correct so here is an attempt to show you what I mean =IMPORTXML("https://api.eveonline.com/account/ch...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2016.04.13 16:38:38
|
10. Npc null and new ore changes. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Eli Stan wrote: Brutus Utama wrote: Move out of NPC null then... Nah. Everywhere else is worse. (Not necessarily because of mining.) We like NPC null. So we wish it was better. In fact, many people like NPC null, proportionally. Behind ...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2015.04.23 03:06:52
|
11. Bye Bye AFK Cloaking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: And the next part of why is because his alliance is in space that is difficult to get to apart from Black Ops, try that in other areas and people will just counter drop the carriers with supers, dreads and titans. But fortress ...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2015.04.03 13:23:32
|
12. Bye Bye AFK Cloaking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Nina Lowel wrote: Yes because smaller entities always have the numbers on for 12-30 carriers at the sound of a ping in their off time zone. As I said, you're ignorant to the problem because you personally don't have the pro...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2015.04.03 13:19:29
|
13. Bye Bye AFK Cloaking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: March rabbit wrote: baltec1 wrote: Nina Lowel wrote: baltec1 wrote: All they can drop are blackops and never in numbers that would overwhelm you . The days of local intel look to be over anyway, CCP are activly toyin...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2015.04.03 13:09:07
|
14. Sticky:[New structures] Observatory Arrays and Gates - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ulrik Elristan wrote: The OAs look to me like a huge home defense advantage. Do you plan on having smaller OAs be very easy to deploy (read fast and non bulky) to counter this ? I'm especially concerned with the cloaky pinpointing. If local is...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2015.04.01 21:20:36
|
15. Bye Bye AFK Cloaking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: All they can drop are blackops and never in numbers that would overwhelm you . The days of local intel look to be over anyway, CCP are activly toying with new tools to replace it. Hahaha. So delusional.
- by Nina Lowel - at 2015.04.01 21:11:22
|
16. Bye Bye AFK Cloaking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Nina Lowel wrote: baltec1 wrote: Nina Lowel wrote: Why, because you say it's not? LOL. A ceptor can tackle someone in just a few seconds upon entering a system, not everything can align and warp in those few seconds. ...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2015.04.01 20:37:40
|
17. Bye Bye AFK Cloaking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dictateur Imperator wrote: Just for information: Local remove rumor come from fuzzy interview , in the same interview he saids "no new structure, and never nerf cloaking". So maybe local will stay. To be continue about nerf of colloquy ship ...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2015.04.01 18:19:27
|
18. Bye Bye AFK Cloaking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Nina Lowel wrote: Why, because you say it's not? LOL. A ceptor can tackle someone in just a few seconds upon entering a system, not everything can align and warp in those few seconds. It happens EVERY DAY, HUNDREDS and HUND...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2015.04.01 18:11:24
|
19. Bye Bye AFK Cloaking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: "removing a source of risk in nullsec without compensation is fine, because the afk people will still occasionally die to interceptors!" Hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of times a day = "occasionally" now. You're...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2015.04.01 17:55:23
|
20. Bye Bye AFK Cloaking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Nina Lowel wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: baltec1 wrote: Yet here you are pushing for a 100% foolproof intel system that would mean pve players could avoid any attempt at pvp on them. People already...
- by Nina Lowel - at 2015.04.01 17:52:47
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |